Skip to content


We’re the People’s Front of Judea..

Differences in religious belief have been an underlying factor in many world conflicts, but for Pythonesque entertainment value, you really can’t beat the current row between the Armenian and Greek Orthodox monks over the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.

Their latest scuffle was over whether a Greek Orthodox monk should be allowed inside the Edicule (a structure built on the alleged site of the resurrection) during an Armenian procession.  This religious disagreement ended up with the Israeli riot police armed with assault rifles filling the church, 2 monks in handcuffs and one Greek Orthodox monk with a cut next to his left eye caused, he says, by an Armenian monk who pushed him from behind and broke his glasses.

That’s not the first time they’ve fought however, in April they were at it again, this time on Palm Sunday after a monk was accused of spending too long at the shrine.  Perhaps predictably, that event ended up with the riot police being beaten back with palm fronds.

Apparently there’s been a ladder on a ledge over the entrance to the church which has been there since the 19th Century since no-one can agree who has the authority to take it down and attempts to add a fire exit have met with inevitable deadlock about where it should be located.

The keys to the church have been held by two Muslim families since 1178 in an attempt to keep the peace, but it sounds to me like the People’s Front of Judea are still alive and well in Jerusalem.  Splitters!

Posted in news, religion.

Tagged with , , , , .


Chromatic Adaptation

Just for a change – here’s a picture. It starts with a black and white photo of a castle wall.
When the black spot appears in the centre, concentrate on it until the picture of the castle reappears and, as long as you don’t move your eyes, it’ll appear to be in colour.

Black and White castle

Now, you’ve probably seen this before (I certainly have) but most places I’ve seen it in the past don’t bother to explain what’s going on.

What’s happening is a process known as chromatic adaptation. If you expose your eyes to a single colour for a period of time, they eventually lose saturation of that colour, causing the complementary colours to appear as an illusionary image when you look away. Basically your brain starts to over-compensate for the saturated colours, so when they’re not there any more the image you see swings too far the other way, into the complements of those colours until you change your focus point.
The colours surrounding the black dot in the image above form the complements (opposites) for the correct colours for the photo, so when they are taken away the over-compensation makes the picture look as though it is in colour.

The same thing on a simpler level is going on in the image below (look at it for 30 seconds and then look at something white).

I don’t know the original sources for either of the pictures incidentally, but I picked them up from My Confined Space and Cool Optical Illusions.

Posted in science.

Tagged with , , , , .


Oliver Postgate – R.I.P.

Sadly I’ve just read that Oliver Postgate, creator of such children’s classics as the Clangers, Bagpuss and Ivor the Engine is no more.

The Clangers of course were famous for disproving all that nonsense about NASA actually landing on the moon and speaking from a written script with Swanee whistles.

The original dialogue was virtually indecipherable, which didn’t stop Postgate getting into trouble when a BBC executive correctly divined that for one clanger he’d written the line: “Oh sod it, the bloody thing won’t open”.

[Edit: In case you were wondering, it’s in this episode.. ]

Bagpuss gave us Professor Yaffle, the Marvellous Magical Mouse-Organ and that saggy old cloth cat who everybody loved.  Surprisingly there were only ever 13 episodes, it certainly seems like more to my childhood memory.  Ivor the Engine taught us that dragons live in Wales, and deemed that forevermore steam engines will go psss-chi-cuff, psss-chi-cuff.

R.I.P. Oliver, thanks for making the world a little more surreal and a lot more friendly.

Now, who do we need to ballot at the BBC to make them repeat them all?

Posted in arts, media, news.

Tagged with , , , .


European Court comes good once more

I’ve posted before about the UK’s DNA database holding information about the innocent as well as the guilty and the difficulties of getting your information removed once it’s there.  1 in 13 people in the UK are currently on the database.

Well, today a case in the European Court has found that the UK government uses the database in a “blanket and indiscriminate way”  with a “disproportionate interference into private life“.

The case was brought by two people, one of whom was 11 (or 12, depending on which report you read) when charged, but not convicted, of theft.  Holding information on innocent people, the court ruled, carried the “risk of stigmatisation” and that the state had overstepped the mark by retaining the information.

Hopefully the government will now be forced to remove any records for people who were never found guilty of a crime.

Interestingly, the BBC are already scaremongering over the issue, pointing out on their TV news coverage that the man convicted of the murders of several prostitutes in Ipswich, Steve Wright, was caught because his DNA was on the database from a previous conviction for theft.   “If he hadn’t been convicted“, we are warned, “and his profile had been deleted, he might have killed again “.  Shades of “if you haven’t done anything wrong then you’ve nothing to hide” there from the Beeb.

Yet another reason to be glad that we’re in the EU and a chance to hear that phrase that brings joy to the heart;

Jacqui Smith, said she was “disappointed”

Posted in media, news.

Tagged with , , .


Freedom of speech

I mentioned the Christopher Handley case before so I’m not going to go over old ground.  This post is just to link to Neil Gaiman’s blog who makes the point far better than I ever could.

You ask, What makes it worth defending? and the only answer I can give is this: Freedom to write, freedom to read, freedom to own material that you believe is worth defending means you’re going to have to stand up for stuff you don’t believe is worth defending, even stuff you find actively distasteful, because laws are big blunt instruments that do not differentiate between what you like and what you don’t, because prosecutors are humans and bear grudges and fight for re-election, because one person’s obscenity is another person’s art.

Posted in media, news.

Tagged with , , .


Mind you, I will have to try ‘World Riding’

I’ve just got back from seeing Eddie Izzard’s new show in London, “Stripped”.  It had some great moments and lots of squirrels and tigers, but unfortunately we ended up leaving with a bit of a sour taste in our mouths.  In the middle of the second half he moved onto the subject of religion and belief which, following a fairly mild heckle from the audience when someone indicated that God had given us Eddie Izzard, turned into a a bit of a shouted anti-religious rant.  Now, I’m the last person to defend any sort of special status for religion, I’m an atheist and have been pretty much forever, but I don’t go to a comedy show to be lectured to about how ridiculous the entire concept is, particularly not in a fairly aggressive manner.

It seemed particularly odd being addressed to an audience in London who, I would imagine, were largely old-school Eddie Izzard fans and are pretty unlikely to have the sort of closed religious fundamentalist opinions he seemed to be attacking.

To me, attacking organised religious belief is like shooting fish in a barrel.  It’s easy to dismiss as founded on ancient myths and legends in the 21st Century if you take a logical viewpoint.  The days where this was a controversial issue were surely buried in the middle ages.  I did wonder whether spending time in the USA, as presumably he does these days, it’s closer to the surface and perhaps I’m misguided in my judgement that the intelligent majority these days are largely non-religious.  Certainly skeptics I’ve met over there are very fond of preaching to the choir to demonstrate their own non-religious superiority.

I will accept that the rise of fundamentalist Islamic belief is a cause for concern, but I still think that it is the beliefs of a relatively small number of people which are being inflated as being much more important than they actually are by religious leaders anxious for power and control.

If you’re a comedian and you want to make jokes about religion, go ahead, it’s a subject ripe for parody, but don’t insult the intelligence of your audience by preaching at them, that’s just lowering yourself to the level of the evangelists.  Be funny – that’s what people have paid for.

Posted in arts, entertainment, reviews.

Tagged with , , .


…and without the Internet I might never have known.

Apparently it’s a pretty good bet that I’m a woman.  Who knew?

Posted in diary.


Let’s hope the spirit of Voltaire survives

If you live in the UK this week, you’ve probably seen the stories about the release of an old membership list for the British National Party (BNP).  The BNP is an ultra-right wing political party, “committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948″.  They have had connections with the National Front and other violent fasist organisations and are generally condemned by mainstream society.

Given their unsavoury policies and dubious connections, it is hardly surprising that many of their members choose to keep their affiliation with the party secret, but even if they were open about their membership I doubt that any of us would be happy about our personal details, including full addresses and telephone numbers, being broadcast over the internet.  Some of the people on the list face losing their jobs (it is a dismissable offence to be a member if you are a service police officer) and talk radio DJ Rod Lucas has been dropped for his membership.  Other members have apparently already received threats.

To add to the confusion, spoof websites claiming to let you search the list for names of people you know,  under the heading “Find the Nazis near you” have appeared, allowing you to add the names of your friends ‘to wind them up’.  There are also Google maps mashups to show you if any members live nearby.

Fortunately the British press so far seem to be resisting calling for a witch-hunt and hopefully any threats and perscution will be limited.  Much as I might disagree with the stated policies of the BNP, their members and the people who support them have a right to their opinions, providing that they exercise them in a non-violent way.

Any persecution of their members is only likely to reinforce their case that they are prevented from stating their opinions openly and potentially add to their members.  Claiming victimisation is a classic way for extreme views to gain currency.   Let’s hope that they aren’t given the satisfaction.

It’s also surprising that the owner of the blog who originally posted the list doesn’t seem to be facing any sort of prosecution.  Publishing anyones’ personal details without their permission I would have thought would, at the very least, be in breach of the Data Protection Act.

(Incidentally, Voltaire didn’t say “I disagree with what you say but I will fight to the death for your right to say it” as he is often quoted.  The phrase appeared in a later book, The Friends of Voltaire (1906), written by Evelyn Beatrice Hall under the pseudonym S[tephen] G. Tallentyre, as a summary of his beliefs.  He did however say “Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too.” which I think is a far better motto to adopt)

Posted in media, news.

Tagged with , , , .


Stephen Fry clone spotted at Prince Charles’ party

The Guardian technology blog has another nice example of how you really can’t regard the media as a guaranteed source of information this week.  Those of you that follow Stephen Fry’s twitter feed will know that over the last few weeks he’s been travelling around with Mark Carwardine, revisiting the animals covered in the book by Douglas Adams and Mark, “Last Chance to See“.

Last weekend, he was travelling back from Madagascar looking at lemur, amongst other things, so it was probably with some surprise that he might have read an article in the Sunday Times.

Seventy-five guests, including the television stars Stephen Fry and Dame Judi Dench, began to arrive at Highgrove, the country home of Charles and Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, shortly before six o’clock yesterday for an evening of entertainment, celebration and the prince’s own organic food.

I guess the Times wasn’t invited.  Mind you, it would provide a handy alibi should he have been up to something more nefarious that Saturday night..

(Incidentally, the BBC were just as bad)

Posted in media, news.

Tagged with , , , .


Free will

A study from the University of Birmingham has just revealed that you can tell a lot about the intelligence level of a person by comparing their relative hands and head sizes.  To conduct the test you simply place your thumbs in your ears and then see if you can touch your index fingers together on top of your head.  If you can then you are likely to have an above average IQ.

Ok, that’s completely made up, but how many of you just tried it?

What I actually wanted to talk about today was free will, and how much of the time we spend just blindly following cues and justifying it afterwards.  As animals we are all apparently very easy to manipulate, particularly when we’re not really concentrating.   Ok, the opening paragraph to this blog was just a silly trick, but marketing professionals, politicians, salesmen and certainly magicians are adept at making us behave the way they want us to behave, no matter how much in control we might think we are at the time.

It is important to remember that our survival instincts have grown up from evolutionary routes, where making the wrong decision at a critical moment could well have devastating consequences.  We often don’t have enough time to evaluate all the options available to us, so we fall back on rules of thumb, short cut behaviours which have proven to be successful in the past and so we rely on to help us in the future.  Of course, as soon as you have a short cut behaviour, then you have something which can be manipulated.

As an example of this Ellen Langer conducted a series of experiments to test the potential rule ‘asking for favours will be more successful if you provide a reason’.  In her experiments she attempted to jump the line at the photocopier by asking if she could push in front and asked for permission in a variety of different ways.  She found that how the request was phrased had a radical effect on the responses she got.

If she asked “Excuse me, I have five pages.  May I use the Xerox machine?” only 60% of people would let her jump the queue.  Phrasing the same request differently, “Excuse me, I have five pages.  May I use the Xerox machine because I’m in a rush?” allowed her to jump the queue in 94% of cases.

What is really interesting however was her third attempt.

Asking “Excuse me, I have five pages.  May I use the Xerox machine because I need to make some copies?” was still successful in 93% of cases, even though she didn’t provide a real reason!  It seems that the rule is sound and can be triggered simply by the appropriate phrasing, irrespective of the actual content.

Now that particular example doesn’t demonstrate why you might follow instructions like the one in this first paragraph, but I would speculate that it has something to do with the authority suggested by a claimed university study, along with a desire to gain an independent affirmation of your own intelligence.  The power of the former was demonstrated in the famous experiments by Stanley Milgram.

His most famous experiment consisted of a pair of subjects, one of whom was apparently connected to a machine which dispensed electric shocks.  The other subject was then instructed by a supervisor, dressed appropriately in a white scientists jacket, that the experiment was looking at how memory changed in different circumstances, and asked them to teach the first subject a set of word pairs.  When the subject got a pair wrong, the second subject was instructed to administer a series of electric shocks.  These shocks increased in voltage for every further incorrect answer.

Of course, in actuality there were no actual shocks administered and the first subject was an actor, but what was telling was how far people were prepared to continue administrating the supposed shocks just because they were told to by an authority figure.  Even when the supposed failing subject began banging on the wall and screaming in pain, many participants continued the experiment.  Most expressed discomfort about the effects to the supervisor, but seemed to require his approval before they would stop, demonstrating the power of the effect.  This would also suggest a need to maintain consistency with previous actions as another manipulating force, but this post is already long enough so I’ll save that for another time!

Now send this post to a friend and see if they put their thumbs in their ears.

Posted in psychology.

Tagged with , , , , .